President Donald Trump is poised to sign an executive order Wednesday aimed at cracking down on pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses, specifically targeting non-citizen students accused of being “Hamas sympathizers.”

The order directs federal agencies to identify and deport resident aliens involved in anti-Israel demonstrations, raising concerns about due process, free speech, and higher education policies.

Trump’s language in the fact sheet was reminiscent of Liam Neeson’s famous monologue in Taken, vowing to find and remove visa-holding students who, in his words, have “infested” American campuses with radicalism.

“To all the resident aliens who joined in the pro-jihadist protests, we put you on notice: come 2025, we will find you, and we will deport you,” Trump said in the fact sheet.

While the administration argues this move is about national security, critics argue it raises serious constitutional and legal concerns.

Consequences Of Visa Revocation

When a student visa is revoked, the impact is immediate. A revoked visa means:

• The student must leave the U.S. immediately or risk deportation.
• Any employment authorization tied to the visa is terminated.
• Future visa applications may be denied, affecting the student’s ability to return to the U.S.

Legal experts argue that while non-citizens have fewer First Amendment protections than U.S. citizens, revoking visas based on campus activism could lead to prolonged legal battles.

Colleges Caught In The Middle

Universities find themselves in a precarious position. Many rely on international students for tuition revenue and academic contributions. However, the order could force institutions to police student activism more aggressively or risk scrutiny from the federal government.

Some schools may also face funding implications. The House GOP has already suggested tying federal aid to universities’ handling of antisemitic incidents. This order could become another lever for restricting funding to institutions seen as tolerating or fostering campus activism perceived as hostile to Israel.

Legal Challenges And Unanswered Questions

The order is expected to face legal challenges, particularly on due process grounds. Past Supreme Court rulings have upheld broad presidential authority over immigration matters, but this order’s focus on campus protests may raise new constitutional questions, especially around free speech.

Some key issues include:

• How agencies will determine what constitutes “sympathy” for Hamas.
• Whether non-violent protest participation could lead to deportation.
• The extent to which universities will be required to report students.

Free speech advocates argue that the move could have a chilling effect on campus discourse, making international students hesitant to engage in any political activism for fear of immigration consequences.

The Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security have 60 days to provide implementation recommendations. Until then, universities and affected students are bracing for potential enforcement actions.

For students on visas, this order underscores the precarious nature of their legal status. Whether the policy withstands legal challenges remains to be seen, but its immediate impact on campus culture and student activism is already being felt.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories: