The global body behind the CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER designation just told planners how to use artificial intelligence without cutting corners on your money — and the rules give consumers a clearer set of expectations.

On June 24, the Financial Planning Standards Board (FPSB), the nonprofit that owns the international CFP program and sets standards for more than 236,000 CFP professionals worldwide, released a Practice Guidance Note on the use of AI in financial planning.

The message to advisors is direct: AI can speed up the work, but the human planner stays on the hook for every recommendation.

Why It Matters

AI is likely already in your advisor’s office, whether you’ve noticed or not. FPSB’s 2025 research, based on responses from more than 6,200 planners across 24 territories, found two in three firms are using AI or plan to within a year.

Planners report using it for client communications (41%), collecting client data (33%), and risk profiling (30%) — the exact tasks that shape the advice you pay for.

That makes AI a consumer issue, not just a back-office one. The same tools that draft your plan faster can also mishandle your data or produce a confident-sounding answer that’s wrong.

What Consumers Should Expect

The guidance gives you a few reasonable things to ask for and expect from a CFP professional:

A human still owns the advice. FPSB is explicit that AI should support, not replace, professional judgment. Your planner remains responsible for the recommendations. “AI made the call” is not an acceptable answer.

Transparency about how AI is used. The guidance stresses transparency and oversight. You can ask where AI shows up in your engagement (drafting communications, analyzing your data, modeling scenarios) and a planner operating to standard should be willing to tell you.

Your data stays protected. Planners flagged data privacy and cybersecurity as their top concern (47%), and the guidance calls out confidentiality, privacy, and cybersecurity as areas needing special care. That means your financial details shouldn’t be fed into consumer AI tools that could store or expose them.

Accuracy gets checked. The second-biggest planner concern was the accuracy and reliability of AI outputs (42%). The guidance tells planners to verify what AI produces rather than pass it along unchecked. Accuracy has been a problem across the board – from answers to student loan questions to general personal finance queries.

The Fine Print

This is global guidance that complements FPSB’s standards. It doesn’t override U.S. law or the CFP Board’s rules, which govern CFP professionals here. So the note sets expectations, not enforcement.

Still, it gives you a useful checklist for a direct conversation with your advisor.

How This Connects

Vetting how an advisor uses AI is part of the same homework you need to do along with vetting how they get paid.

As The College Investor has covered, a CFP can be fee-only or fee-based, and titles alone don’t tell you whether someone is acting in your interest — fee structures run from under 0.30% at robo-advisors to 1%+ at traditional firms, with flat financial plans often running from under $1,000 to $3,000.

Add one more question to the list: how do you use AI, and how do you protect my data when you do?

AI is becoming standard equipment in financial planning. The work you’re paying for — judgment, accountability, and protection of your information — is supposed to stay human. Now you have a reason to ask your advisor to confirm it.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories: